PRESS RELEASE Print E-mail
Active ImageFor a long time, articles have been published in the county daily “Mesagerul hunedorean” in which they try to discredit the local public authority and, with a more than obvious tone, of the Mayor of Hunedoara, Nicolae Schiau. The most recent such attempt is the “OPEN LETTER” signed “Hunedoara Municipal Organization of the NATIONAL LIBERAL PARTY”, in which totally baseless accusations are made against the mayor of the locality, and even given valuable information about actions on the agenda of his concerns.
The text of that letter states that the Hunedoara City Hall did not consider the initiative (sic!) Of liberal local councilors to establish a partnership between Hunedoara County Council and the public authority of Hunedoara, for the rehabilitation of the county road DJ687 Sântuhalm – Hunedoara – Călan.
It seems that the respectable liberal councilors forgot that they were among those who voted HCL no. 271 / 30.12.2004 regarding the association between the Local Council of Hunedoara municipality and Hunedoara County Council in order to promote the project “Rehabilitation of county road DJ687: Sântuhalm – Hunedoara – Călan, section Sântuhalm – Hunedoara, km 7 + 590 – 10 + 090”, HCL no. . 22 / 26.01.2005, approving the Feasibility Study of the investment objective “Rehabilitation of county road DJ 687: Sântuhalm – Hunedoara – Călan, section Sântuhalm – Hunedoara, km 0 + 000-10 + 090”, within the PHARE Program 2004-2006 – Economic and Social Cohesion – Large regional infrastructure projects ”. It should be noted that, by the same decision, the Local Council of Hunedoara approved the allocation from the local budget of the amount of 648,090 Euro, representing 7.26% share of the eligible costs of the project, to which is added 147,633 Euro from the related ineligible costs. Also, in order to achieve the same investment objective, the association of the two authorities was approved by HCL no. 104 / 28.04.2005. These amounts were conditioned by the selection of the project, which did not happen, and the investment will be made by allocating funds from the budgets of the factors involved. Perhaps it is not bad to mention that the Local Council of Hunedoara contribu also contributes to a large extent to the constitution of the County Council budget. In 2005, the association of the two authorities was approved. These amounts were conditioned by the selection of the project, which did not happen, and the investment will be made by allocating funds from the budgets of the factors involved. Perhaps it is not bad to mention that the Local Council of Hunedoara contribu also contributes to a large extent to the constitution of the County Council budget. In 2005, the association of the two authorities was approved. These amounts were conditioned by the selection of the project, which did not happen, and the investment will be made by allocating funds from the budgets of the factors involved. Perhaps it is not bad to mention that the Local Council of Hunedoara contribu also contributes to a large extent to the constitution of the County Council budget.
It should be noted that at no time was the idea of ​​continuing the works on this investment objective abandoned by the Hunedoara municipality or by the mayor of the city.
Local investment priorities must be clear to everyone, set according to the needs of Hunedoara’s citizens. And because the local elected officials do not want to put the cart before the oxen, they preferred to first implement a project within the ISPA Program to double the capacity of the collector channel to collect domestic water from Hunedoara and transport it to the treatment plant. This project involves overlapping significant sections between DJ687 and the collector route, as well as crossing DJ687 (underground) through several places. Moreover, the works already completed at the mentioned road section will be affected by the location of the new Hunedoara – Sântuhalm collector canal.
Are there other priorities for liberal councilors?